“And so, again, I think the reflection, the humility, the need for us to really sit back - and I mean me, but also anyone else that had been in a leadership position - to really sit back and try to fully understand how we could miss things was the most important priority.”Īllegations against Dames didn’t end in November, however. We actually were believing that we were some of the good people. “We didn’t have knowledge of incidents or complaints. “We didn’t think that there was anything to hide,” Whisler said. It was that it was a workplace that needed improvements, and the players wanted to finish the season.”Īnd in terms of the “separation agreement” with Dames, the understanding is that he resigned or was allowed to resign. “Because it was not that there was an urgent or dangerous (situation) or implication of an incident.

And it was.”īut why let the players finish out the season if the findings of the workplace were not considered safe or were hostile or abusive or anything like that? We told them that (Sunday) morning after the championship we were doing that and worked through a separation agreement during the day that had to be finished by midnight. “But that said, when we finished the season and we had finished our workplace assessment, it was clear we needed to change. We didn’t have any reason to believe that there was a safety issue in our environment. We owed the players (who) had worked incredibly hard a chance to finish their season. “It’s not linked to the Washington Post per se.

Chicago red stars coach